|
|
| |
All the Vibe
By Neil Wolkodoff, Ph.D.
March 2007
Curious about vibration technology? It's the latest technology to hit
the industry, with a host of manufacturers offering their own products.
Find out about the products' history, relevant research and practical
applications for your fitness center.
The fitness industry is always looking for things
that are scientifically valid, add excitement to exercise and improve
results. Whole Body Vibration (WBV) has been touted as a way to improve
everything from strength to hormones. At the FIBO 2006 show, there were
31 WBV equipment manufacturers, and consumers are beginning to see
clever ads linking improved health to inexpensive, home gym versions.
Vibration training can be a useful warm-up modality before an exercise session or athletic performance.
This is not a case of too good to be true but, rather, true within
the context of WBV machine benefits. They do work — but not for
everything, and not for everyone. Their place in the commercial market
is dependent on type, use and guided versus unguided application. Until
now, their primary use has been in therapy clinics and for training
professional athletes.
WBV machines offer a variety of exercises, but the question
is, which exercises and applications are commercially viable? Users can
stand on a WBV machine in a squat position, move dynamically, stretch,
balance, and even perform resistance-training exercises or plyometrics.
Not many protocols are set in stone; instead, they are determined by
the training paradigm of the fitness professional. If there are
drawbacks, WBV requires a well-designed program to be effective and,
for self-guided use, a good educational program and instructional
materials.
HistoryThe
specifics are sketchy, but it appears that the Russians and Dutch
originally developed WBV as a tool sometime in the 1970s. The Russian
scientist, Nazarov, was reportedly the first to explore vibration, with
other studies performed by an Israeli scientist, Issurin. They found
that standing on a vibrating plate produced a number of positive
benefits, including increases in bone density and leg strength. Some
other initial research was performed in Germany on a teeter-totter-type
platform. What looked like machines made in a garage became a bona-fide
exercise category in the late 1990s, when the first commercial units
were manufactured by Galileo (now VibraFlex), followed by PowerPlate in
2000.
Contributing to the growth of WBV was the success experienced by Dutch
speed skaters, and an accumulating body of evidence that demonstrated a
number of health and performance applications. The Russians found this
device potentially useful at countering the long periods of
weightlessness in space, as it helped to maintain astronauts' bone
density. WBV as a possible intervention for osteoporosis helped to fuel
the popularity of both low-end home machines and commercial units.
Initially, the machines were solid plates, some with
handlebars and some without. Now, machines have handlebars,
programmable controls, and weight limits up to 1,500 pounds, which
allows for plyometric training and Olympic-style weightlifting to be
performed on the plates.
Rather than being a defined technology with set protocols and
applications, WBV can be described as a category in the launch stage,
just getting off the ground.
Not so fastExcessive
vibration, especially connected with an occupation, such as operating a
jackhammer, has been demonstrated to cause numbness, loss of
circulation, joint damage and other harmful effects. However, these
applications occur for hours at a time, not a five-minute session. Such
organizations as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and
the American National Standards Institute, as well as work-safety
experts, have suggested limitations to vibration exposure. In July
2005, Control of Vibration at Work Regulations was issued in the United
Kingdom. This document set standards for both hand and WBV exposure,
which is directly linked to the magnitude of the vibration, combined
with exposure time.
Obviously, exposure to excessive vibration in the workplace
for up to 40 hours per week is quite different than using WBV as an
intermittent fitness or therapy modality.
Vibration biophysicsWBV,
and even the few hand-held units on the market, work with four
variables that act on the human body. Hertz (Hz) are the cycles per
second, which is essentially the vibration speed. Amplitude, or the
depth or travel of the vibration, is generally measured in millimeters,
and is a factor that determines intensity (most machines have high and
low settings). On a fixed platform, users can change the distance the
vibration travels. On a tilting platform, users change the amplitude by
using a wider stance. On a sound-driven machine, users turn up the
volume. Magnitude, or the acceleration power of the movement, is a
measure of the mechanism and its movement through space and time.
Duration is the amount of time spent on the machine. How users adjust
these variables determines their results, and the type of machine also
determines how they adjust the variables.
How vibration affects the body involves a number of reactions
and systems. As the plate vibrates, the body goes through relatively
quick oscillations, when states of more or less gravity are alternately
applied. Vibration stimulates innate muscle spindle activation. The
rapid continual firing of this mechanism, due to vibration, is known as
the Tonic Vibrational Reflex (TVR). The effect on the muscular system —
especially when flexed, such as in a half squat — is to fire the
stretch reflex (SR) through the muscle spindles to add muscular force.
In addition, the golgi tendon organs (GTO) are activated by relatively
strong contractions, lessening the force on the muscle as a protective
mechanism. Theoretically, the muscles are fired, relaxed somewhat and
fired again in this scenario, in response to WBV. However, just because
something vibrates doesn't mean it invokes these physiological
mechanisms. There is some evidence that at 8 to 10 Hz, the SR is not
activated the same way it is as at 25 Hz. Positioning and movement
obviously would elicit a smaller or greater response, in addition to Hz
and amplitude variation.
Further research is needed to discover the placement of vibration training within an overall conditioning program.
In terms of hormonal system changes, there have been reports of
similar increases in testosterone and growth hormone to resistance
training, with some speculation that the physiological responses to
mechanical vibration are tied to these effects. However, as there
appears to be less stress on the body with WBV compared to weight
training, Cortisol (a measure of stress response) has been lower in
response to WBV.
WBV activates the joint receptors to supply increased
information about body position and state of posture. Mechanoreceptors
respond to both passive and active movement, as well as the range of
movement speeds.
Research overviewOne
of the issues with WBV research to date is that the type of vibration
applied, combined with the specific exercise, time and frequency, all
determine results. Because there are now very different forms of
vibration, it is difficult, without comparative studies, to apply
research from one type of machine to another. A large portion of the
initial research was performed on tilting platforms, and then later
performed on fixed platforms.
When viewing the available research, it is important to note
whether the study looked at changes immediately after a WBV session, or
over an extended period of time. There is significant data to strongly
indicate that a number of variables improve right after a WBV session,
such as strength, explosive abilities, balance, shuttle run speed and
flexibility. This points to a conclusion held by many practitioners
that WBV can be a useful warm-up modality before an exercise session or
athletic performance.
Long-term studies, such as those performed by Torvinen, et
al., where body balance in non-athletic young adults improved,
demonstrates that, over longer periods of time, WBV can improve some
physiological measures. Increased bone density, measured by Bone
Mineral Density tests, is one of the largest research areas on the
positive effects of WBV. Verschueren, et al., studied the effect WBV
had over six months on bone density in the hip and postural control,
and found significant benefits. Rubin, et al., extended the time of WBV
treatment to one year, and found a similar increase in bone density in
post-menopausal women. A few studies have found little or no change in
young adults, while there have been measurable and positive changes
with children and older adults. Some of this may have to do with state
of training and previous loads, and just where WBV stimulus fits
according to those variables. In other words, with young adults who are
active, WBV may not have been significant compared to loads experienced
during normal activities. For the older and younger groups, however,
WBV was significant.
Strength gains have been researched by Bosco, et al.,
Roelants, et al., and others, looking at leg extensor strength and
explosive capabilities. In these studies, WBV showed positive responses
in such measures as vertical jumping ability, theorized to be enhanced
through increased neurological activation, as well as some muscular
development. One of the reasons explosive or power applications show
improvement immediately after WBV may be linked to increased
neurological activation.
Some studies, such as the one done by Abercromby, et al.,
comparing tilting or teeter-totter to vertical platforms (especially
with regard to leg strength), demonstrated that tilting platforms had
higher leg activation results as knee angles get more extreme. While it
can be argued that all vibration will — if applied at the correct
settings and duration — result in strength gains, testers noted that
the same Hz level and amplitude did not feel the same on all the test
machines. This is an important observation; vibration applications may
be mildly specific to the vibration type and application.
With regard to strength, overall strength improvement is
linked with frequencies of 20 to 27 Hz, yet that doesn't mean higher
frequencies/amplitudes or lower amplitudes, if applied correctly,
wouldn't lead to significant strength gains. With respect to upper-body
exercise devices, such as the Mini by VibraFlex, this area is not
well-researched, but it can be conjectured that, if applied within a
sound model, results would be positive.
Because platforms have recently been developed that allow
resistance training and plyometric movements (specifically, The Wave
and Pneumex), it would be reasonable to expect that future research
will address combining WBV with more aggressive movements. It may be
that the studies to date that demonstrated no or little improvement in
explosive capabilities simply did not place vibration within the
optimal phase of training with the optimal load/dose for improvement.
Further research is still needed to discover the exact placement of WBV
within an overall conditioning program, and how it can be "periodized"
within a fitness or sports training model that is applicable to various
populations and levels of fitness.
Flexibility showed significant increases, especially
immediately after a bout of WBV, or an acute treatment. Other areas
have documented improvement from WBV, including hormonal gains,
balance, posture, minor cardiovascular improvements and pain relief.
Types of vibration machinesWhen
first introduced, there were two initial designs. The tilting, or
teeter-totter, platforms (VibraFlex and MaxuVibe are examples) were
developed with the cross-over pattern of the body in mind (for example,
the right hand moves with left leg in walking). Plus, the purported use
of leg and hip independence from side to side was taken into
consideration. The original fixed plate has vibrations occurring in a
vertical plane.
Recently, a number of different approaches have been used to
modify the vibration output and, theoretically, increase the training
effect. Some fixed platforms now offer a combination of vertical,
side-to-side and front-to-back vibration (such as PowerPlate). Some
machines sense load and adjust structurally to keep Hz
cycles/amplitudes constant (Pneumex uses staggered supports at
45-degree angles for this purpose). Air adjustment systems have been
developed to compensate for various user weights to keep Hz and
amplitude levels constant through increased or decreased pneumatic
pressure under the platform (The Wave and PowerPlate). Additionally,
one manufacturer uses sound waves under the platform to create minute
Hz changes that also start at small Hz levels (Turbosonic).
VersaClimber is the first company to apply vibration to exercise
machines, and currently has four machines that offer vibration. At the
time this article was written, there were reports of new units using
two or three motors to apply vibration in various patterns. (See What
Machines are Available for a list of companies.)
Facility integrationThe
scientific evidence makes a case that WBV is a useful and effective
modality in rehabilitation, general fitness and sports performance.
With the addition of upper-body devices, such as the VibraFlex Mini and
the ExerVibe hand-held, you can expect more application to upper-body
resistance training.
So what would make WBV effective in your facility? First, it
is important to educate your staff on WBV and how to use it within a
fitness program. According to two industry experts, Mike Boyle and J.C.
Santana, with education and such direction as posters/wall charts,
members can safely and effectively use WBV on their own.
Also, personal trainers are an important part of the
usefulness of WBV in fitness centers. Clients will not only be better
educated on the uses of WBV when working with trainers, but other
members who see the product in use are more likely to follow suit. And,
independent training organizations, like VibroKinetix
(www.bettervibrations.com), are emerging to help fitness professionals
better use WBV as a training tool.
WBV can be effective, with the right knowledge and for the
right training goals. Before buying a machine just because it is the
latest trend, do your homework to find out if WBV is a right fit for
your fitness center.
References
Abercromby, A.F.J., W. Amonette, W.
Paloski and M. Hinsman. Neuromuscular Responses to Two Whole-Body
Vibration Modalities During Dynamic Squats. Presented at the NSCA
National Conference and Exposition, Free Communications, Paris Hotel,
Las Vegas, Nev., Jul. 7, 2005.
Bosco, C., M. Cardinale, et al. The influence of whole-body vibration on jumping performance. Biology of Sport V15, N3: 157-164, 1998
Bosco, C., M. Cardinale, et al. Hormonal responses to whole-body vibration in men. European Journal of Applied Physiology V81: 449-454, 2000
Bosco, C., R. Colli, R. Introini, M.
Cardinale, M. Iacovelli, J. Tihanyi, S.P. von Duvillard and A. Viru.
Adaptive responses of human skeletal muscle to vibration exposure. Clinical Physiology 19:183–187, 1999
Cardinale, M., and C. Bosco. The use of vibration as an exercise intervention. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 31:3-7, 2003
Delecluse, C., M. Roelants, R. Diels,
E. Koninckx and S. Vershueren. Effects of whole body vibration on
muscular strength and sprint performance in sprint-trained athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine 26; 662-668, 2005
Garg, D.P., and M.A. Ross. Vertical mode human body vibration transmissibility. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 6: 102-112, 1976
Issurin, V.B., D.G. Liebermann and G. Tenenbaum. Effect of vibratory stimulation training on maximal force and flexibility. Journal of Sports Sciences 12:561–566, 1994
Mester, J., H. Kleinoder and Z. Yue. Vibration training: Benefits and risks. Journal of Biomechanics Apr. 30, 2005
Rittweger, J., G. Beller and D. Felsenberg. Acute physiological effects of exhaustive whole-body vibration exercise in man. Clinical Physiology 20:134-142, 2000
RŘnnestad, B. Comparing the
performance-enhancing effects of squats on a vibration platform with
conventional squats in recreationally resistance-trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 18:839-845, 2004
Rubin, C., R. Recker, D. Cullen, J.
Ryaby, J. McCabe and K. McLeod. Prevention of postmenopausal bone loss
by a low-magnitude, high-frequency mechanical stimuli: A clinical trial
assessing compliance, efficacy and safety. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 19(3):343-51. March 2004, Epub Dec. 22, 2003
Torvinen, S., P. Kannus, H. SievaČnen,
T.A. JaČrvinen, M. Pasanen, S. Kontulainen and L.N. Teppo. Effect of a
vibration exposure on muscular performance and body balance: Randomized
cross-over study. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 22:145-152, 2002
Verschueren, S., M. Roelents, C.
Delecluse, S. Swinnen, et al. Effect of six-month whole-body vibration
training on hip density, muscle strength and postural control in
post-menopausal women: A randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research V19, N3: 352-359, 2003
Back to top
What Machines Are Available
By Neil Wolkodoff, Ph.D.
March 2007
For this article, more than 100 personal trainers, physical therapists
and strength coaches were invited to test the various vibration plates
side by side in a neutral location to develop a consensus on the best
use for each particular plate. Major manufacturers were contacted, and
asked to send demonstration plates. Those manufacturers who elected to
participate were Maxuvibe, Pneumex, PowerPlate, Turbosonic,
VersaClimber, VibraFlex and The Wave.
For the testing, each machine was assembled according to
manufacturer specifications, and tested to ensure good working
condition. Participants were given an overview of how each machine
functioned, then completed a short session on each machine to become
familiar with controls, Hz, amplitude, etc. The session involved using
a static squat exercise (an exercise used by most vibration companies).
After participants became familiar with each machine, they
were instructed to go back to each machine and perform a static squat,
dynamic squat, push-up and triceps dip. After completion, participants
completed a short survey on ease of use, function, its best potential
use and how they viewed each machine fitting into the marketplace.
Note: Technical information and suggested retail pricing were supplied by manufacturers.
FitVibe
877 FIT-VIBE; www.fitvibeusa.com The
model tested was the Excel Pro ($11,850), a commercial machine. (The
FitVibe 600 [$9,985] uses similar mechanisms, with a square plate and a
separate control pedestal from the vibration plate/handles.) The
FitVibe Pro has the same settings and function as the 600, but not a
separate control tower. The unit has a smart card system (the software
package is an additional $1,700), on-screen programming and
instructions, and will handle users up to 600 pounds. A trainer or
therapist can write a program to the chip card using a computer, and
have the card guide clients through their workouts. The unit goes from
20 to 60 Hz in 1 Hz increments.
Comments. Users liked the ability to increase Hz in small increments. Additionally, they said the unit "felt solid" and well-made.
Consensus. The separate control tower and computer
software option would make the FitVibe 600 a good choice for
rehabilitation clinics, where patients could have the card guide them
through their specific workout.
Maxuvibe
800 223-1362; www.rudolphmedical.com Maxuvibe
is a teeter-totter platform that has a touch screen with diagrams,
instructions and a self-timer. Unlike most other units, it starts at 5
Hz, with settings up to 30 Hz. The on-screen instructions direct the
user's stance and Hz settings for beginner, intermediate and advanced
users. The MX-7 sells for $10,500 to $11,900, depending on options,
with a weight capacity listing of 290 pounds.
Comments. Users liked the touch screen. As with other
teeter-totter platforms, leg exercises were found to be the best option
on this machine. Users said the moveable platform itself may not be
large enough for big feet, but the large number of handle positions
would be supportive of various body sizes and a wide variety of
exercises.
Consensus. This platform would work well for self-serve facilities, because of the instructions and suggested levels in the display panel.
Pneumex
800 447-5792; www.pneumex.com Pneumex
makes two versions of its WBV platform, which can handle loads of up to
1,400 pounds. The Pneu-Vibe Pro has a hand-held control and is 30 by 40
inches, while the Pneu-Vibe Club has a pedestal/handle assembly with
controls, and is 30 by 16 inches. Pneumex has its own sports
performance program, F.A.S.T., built around this equipment. The unit
has Hz ranges from 10 to 60 Hz, and a high/low amplitude setting. The
supports are staggered at 45-degree angles to negate the effects of
heavy loads or plyometrics without degradation in Hz or amplitude.
Large foam blocks are useful accessories that allow for weight lifting
or plyometric exercises, as well as a foam pad attachment for core or
flexibility exercises.
Comments. Pneumex was the overwhelming choice for using
WBV with plyometric and weight-lifting movements. Many of the testers
tried various plyometric jumps and weight-lifting movements on the
platform, and rated it solid with those exercises.
Consensus. In the "Pro" configuration, without the
pedestal/control tower, the testers were almost unanimous that, outside
a supervised training environment, the lack of handles would make this
unit impractical for beginners or older adults.
PowerPlate
877 87-PLATE; www.powerplate.com PowerPlate
is probably the most recognizable WBV equipment in the industry. The
vibration motion is 3-D, with 70 percent of the vibration moving
upward, 20 percent side to side and 10 percent front to back. There are
two models, the Pro5 Airdaptive ($10,500) and Pro5 ($9,250). The
Airdaptive has three air settings to accommodate users of different
weights, using air adjustments to maintain Hz and amplitude, and can
handle users up to 385 pounds. Hz settings go from 30 to 50, with a
high/low amplitude setting, and time settings of 30, 45 and 60 seconds.
PowerPlate also has a secondary control just above the platform for use
with seated and prone exercises. Additionally, PowerPlate has a
structured educational program that offers five full-day workshops on
various applications to educate trainers and coaches on the uses of
WBV. PowerPlate also offers online educational options, which are
available at no additional cost with the purchase of a machine.
Comments. PowerPlate was termed the "sexiest" machine
in the group, with its sleek lines and "attractive" display, and the
testers noted this feature would help attract new users to the machine.
In terms of function, the users found the panel and controls easy to
use, with the variety of handles on the pedestal/control conducive to a
wide variety of exercises. For exercises like push-ups or dips, the
PowerPlate was the clear winner, especially when using the lower
control board.
Consensus. Because of its small educational poster and
staff education options, the testers felt this would work equally well
with personal training and self-guided users.
TurboSonic
714 544-0200; www.turbosonicusa.com TurboSonic
is the first WBV platform to use sound waves to generate vibration.
TurboSonic can achieve very low Hz in vibration (3 hz) because it uses
audio amplifiers and speakers. The TurboSonic Professional ($16,000)
comes with a 22-by-27-inch platform, six pre-set programs and a manual
mode. Its maximum weight capacity is 484 pounds. The Deluxe model
($13,000) has a slightly smaller platform, and was the model used in
testing. The Hz and amplitude (volume) are both controlled with rotary
dials, and this was the only unit tested that had a remote control. Hz
settings start at 3 Hz, and can be increased up to 50 Hz.
Comments. Users agreed that the TurboSonic had a sleek,
clinical look and appeal. A weak point, according to testers, was that
the manual program was the last, instead of first, program choice.
Because it looks "somewhat like a scale," the testers thought it would
not be visually intimidating to new users. Another strong feature of
the TurboSonic was, despite the fact that vibration was accomplished
through sound, the unit was quiet. Starting at low Hz levels was a plus
in that it was "so gentle that an older beginner would feel
comfortable."
Consensus. Because the Deluxe version is smaller than
most units, the testers felt this would be an optimal unit in an
environment where space, sound and aesthetics were issues.
VersaClimber
800 237-2271; www.versaclimber.com VersaClimber
is the first equipment company to place vibration into commercial
exercise machines. It currently offers two products: ExerVibe Climber
($5,995) and ExerVibe Stepper ($4,995). Two additional pieces of
equipment, ExerVibe ViBar ($3,995) and ExerVibe In-Line ($2,495), are
in development. These machines use a patented, cam-driven vibration
mechanism, so various body weights on the machines do not affect the 30
Hz vibration, or amplitude of 4 mm. The Climber and Stepper both have
seats, so individuals with lower levels of fitness can use them. There
are three protocols, from beginner to advanced. For this test, the
Climber and ViBar were used.
Comments. The combination of energy system exercise and
WBV is novel, and testers felt facility members and clients would
either really like the ExerVibe concept or not. Testers thought there
would be large appeal for exercise that combines a WBV component with
whole-body energy system training.
Consensus. Testers said the VersaClimber products would
make both an excellent training tool, and potentially an ideal
component for a warm-up, because it combines time efficiency with added
results.
VibraFlex
877 249-4229; www.vibraflex.com The
VibraFlex is the next generation of the Galileo, built on the same
principles and platform, and has four patents for its teeter-totter
platform. Much of the first research was performed on this design.
There are three commercial models in the line: VibraFlex 600 ($13,899),
VibraFlex 550 ($11,899) and the hand-held Mini-VibraFlex ($3,950). The
600 has a weight limit of 450 pounds, and features a new console that
offers printouts and computer connections. VibraFlex has positioned
this as a high-end "profit center." Controls allow for 4 Hz speeds,
time settings and amplitude controlled by foot position on the enlarged
platform — as well as the ability to program the unit with a
programmable "chip card," where workouts and time can be programmed.
The control tower is not connected to the base, so there is not a
secondary source of vibration.
Comments. The testers said that, for a "leg workout,"
this machine was their top choice, and its expanded platform allowed
for various stance modifications. Like other teeter-totter platforms,
the testers did not feel this was a good platform for such exercises as
push-ups or dips. The programmable features were seen as a plus with
training clients or rehabilitation patients.
Consensus. Testers said this equipment would work in
situations where there was some direction, such as an instructional
poster; but, once users understand that amplitude is controlled by
stance width, the concepts are easy to apply.
The WAVE
866 420-7546; www.wavexercise.com The
WAVE is a large platform intended for rigorous use. It sets the machine
to the user's exact weight through a patent-pending self-calibration
system. Theoretically, this keeps the Hz and amplitude constant over
wide weight ranges. The WAVE ($15,000) has a 36-by-30-inch steel
platform, performs from 20 to 50 Hz with a high/low amplitude setting
and has a weight limit of 1,500 pounds. Additionally, The WAVE was one
of only two platforms with on-screen instructions, a touch screen and
initial settings on how to perform various exercises. Like the other
platforms, users can attach upper-body straps to The WAVE.
Comments. The wide platform allowed the testers to try
various squat and lunge positions, a plus from their perspective for
legwork. Because this was the only machine that calibrated the user's
weight, testers felt they could put clients or members of different
weights on the machine, yet get the same feel and results. They said it
would take some education for members to understand they needed to
calibrate the machine, but that would be a short-lived issue once they
understood the machine's particulars.
Consensus. The touch screen was viewed as a plus, as it
would guide users through machine functioning, so this would be a good
machine for both a self-guided facility and personal training
applications.
Editor's Note
Other companies that also manufacture WBV machines, but did not participate in this article, include:
- FreeMotion Fitness, 877 363-8449, www.freemotionfitness.com
- Hypergravity, 818 468-6252, www.hypergravity.net
- VibroGym, +31 (0)23 517 35 80, www.vibrogym.com
Neil Wolkodoff, Ph.D., is the developer of Physical Golf and
Zonal Training Technologies, based at the Greenwood Athletic Club in
Englewood, Colo. He has served as an editor for ACE and ACSM, and is
the author of four books.
Back to top
|
| |
© Copyright 2007 Fitness Management |
|
|